Idaho murder suspects Bryan Kohberger’s case takes a new turn when prosecutors call their family to testify

Bryan Kohberger In the upcoming murder trial, it is possible to face testimony from your own family.

The 30-year-old is currently accused of being an outdoor home in Moscow, Idaho, involving University of Idaho students Madison University, Kelly Gonkavis, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin.

Bryan Kohberger’s lawyers requested that his family be given priority seats, but prosecutors objected to it in a recent document.

Prosecutors say Bryan Korberger’s family may testify at the trial.

Earlier this month, Koberg’s legal team asked the judge to grant his family a priority seat in the upcoming trial.

However, prosecutors now partially denied the request, and also asked the judge to prohibit any potential witnesses from Koberg’s family from attending the trial before they testify.

“The state can call members of the Koberg family to testify at the trial,” Lata County Attorney Ashley Jennings wrote in court. New York Post.

She added: “The State is expected to motion the court before the trial begins, otherwise the court will, as the court itself, usually exclude witnesses from the court in order to avoid hearing testimony from other witnesses.”

Prosecutors argue that murder suspects’ families do not have the same legal rights as victims

Elsewhere in the filings, Jennings argued that the defendant’s family did not have the same legal rights as the victim.

“The defendant demanded the same rights as the victim’s family.” “However, the ‘immediate family of the victim’s homicide’ enjoys constitutional and statutory rights,” Jennings continued. [the] The Idaho Constitution…there is no comparable constitution or statutory provision that makes the defendant’s family the same rights. ”

Jennings also shut down Koberg’s attorneys claiming that not giving family members priority seats would violate his Sixth Amendment rights.

Prosecutors included in her documents that the defendant has constitutional and legal rights to ‘public trial’, but this does not extend to the person the defendant chose to sit in court. ”

Judge has previously ruled that Bryan Kohberger’s lawyers have filed a request from defense experts

One key evidence in the upcoming trial is the scabbard, where Koberg’s DNA was found at the murder scene.

His lawyer tried to throw the scabbard by arguing about Franks’ hearing, and the hippies closed.

Recently, they have asked to attract defense experts to oppose prosecutors’ theory about Koberg’s Amazon shopping history, where he assumed he bought the knife used to murder the murder case.

The testimony was intended to convince the judge to exclude Kohberger’s Amazon shopping record and “click activity” from the jury.

But, like Franks’ hearing, Shippler ruled against Copper’s attorney’s request.

Shippler wrote in an order: “The message seeking to be conveyed by a declaration.” Fox News. “A lawyers may provide witnesses via video streaming during the hearing, and the court may allow testimony live streaming through video if it determines that it is necessary to hear from the witness.”

Why Bryan Kohberger’s defense team may still use DNA arguments at trial

Despite the ruling, Koberg’s legal team is likely to reintroduce unknown genetic material during the trial.

Sources earlier claimed that this could help the team “muddy waters” and sparked reasonable suspicion in the mind of the jury.

“The evidence can be all sorts of things: it could be something, or it could be a lot,” criminal defense attorney Edwina Elcox said of the newly discovered DNA. “There is at least something that can be done, and it’s better than a defense that has nothing to do.”

But Elcox admits that this is not enough to win Kohberger’s innocence, because his DNA on the skin is too “critical” to the case.

“This is what it is directly proposed [Kohberger] There, “the female lawyer talked about scabbards. “The scale of evidence in the state’s case is crucial and cannot be underestimated. ”

About Brian Koberg’s Trial

Kohberger’s trial is scheduled to take place in August this year and will be held in Boise, Idaho. Initially, it was scheduled to take place in Moscow, Idaho, but his defense successfully argued for concerns about the possibility of an unfair trial to change the location.

The lawsuit will first focus on determining whether a 30-year-old has committed four counts of murder and one charge of burglary.

If convicted, a separate phase will be held to decide whether the death penalty should be imposed because the murder charge is the death penalty in the state.

With the possibility of a two-phase trial, the case is expected to be extended to November. Once all pretrial motions are resolved, the jury selection will begin in late July.

Kohberger is currently out of bail while awaiting trial, but is still on bail.