Lisa Schiff, a once-respected consultant, was sentenced to 30 months in prison for defrauding clients of an estimated $6.5 million. Through a multi-million dollar plan that lasted for more than five years, Schiff pulled back client funds for blue-chip funding acquisitions and high-risk sales to fund luxury lifestyles, including Tribeca’s $25,000 monthly luxury apartments, designer shopping for Sprees Sprees and Globe TroteTing Tactations. U.S. Attorney Matthew Podolsky announced in the media that “Schiff will now be sentenced to a large number of sentences in prison due to Schiff’s lies and her illusory art consultation scam.”
In theory, consultants aim to follow ethical codes when acting as intermediary between clients and the art market. The main one of these principles is to always put the best interests of the client first when providing art acquisitions, sales and investment guidance. It’s a fiduciary Schiff trampling on some indifference, always blurring who owns what artwork and how to manage the funds. As the prosecutor pointed out in court, “relying on art dealers and consultants as intermediaries to exchange payments, communicating between buyers and sellers, and detaining artworks”, the scammers of the Moorish scammers schiff ultimately admitted.
Schiff has provided advice to elite clients with her visits to large galleries and auction houses, including Hollywood stars such as real estate tycoon and art collectors Aby Rosen and Leonardo DiCaprio. Through her company Schiff Fine Art (SFA) (SFA), a boutique gallery outpost in Tribeca, Schiff has deceived at least 12 clients with an artist, another artist’s property and a gallery. Her script is simple and bold: she controls the money customers think are used to buy art and the art they send her. Often, she either never received the promised works or quietly sold them without saying a word – no invoices, no mentions, no money.
The scam began in May 2023, five years after it began, when Richard Grossman filed his first lawsuit with collector Candace Carmel Barasch. They claimed Schiff failed to pay for the $2.5 million sale of Adrian Ghenie paintings sold in Sotheby’s Hong Kong and withheld $1.8 million in fees. Barasch, a regular on the ARTNEWS top 200 collector list from 2014 to 2018, also claimed they had offered Schiff $6.6 million to acquire works by Wangechi Mutu, Sarah Lucas and other artists that never came true. Soon Schiff’s fragile house of cards begins to collapse: at least forty collectors come forward to demand a return to their original state, forcing her company to close. Meanwhile, artist Seffa Klein, who previously showed on Schiff’s Tribeca Space, filed a claim of about $506,000, while American Express jumped into Fray and sued Schiff for unpaid fees of more than $500,000.
See: Collector’s Art Authentication Guide to Avoid Expensive Mistakes
With the dissolution of the fraud, inventory filed in the court in August 2023 shows that more than 900 artworks (at a value of $3.1 million) are listed in Schiff Fine Art (SFA) assets to repay creditors. However, according to Winston Art Group, the company is responsible for evaluating holdings, with about 100 other works not prompted. (“We are still trying to find stocks that are missing,” Douglas Pick, who was appointed to liquidate his shares, told observers in early 2023.) By January 2024, Schiff had filed for bankruptcy, triggering her art collection to meet lasting debt. The liquidation began in November Phillips, where more than 200 works raided the auction area, including the main works of Jean-Michel Basquiat, Richard Prince and other prominent talents.
Schiff had considered first acknowledging her wrongdoing in 2020, according to a memo released by the U.S. District Attorney’s Office of the Southern New York District, Schiff had considered the first to admit her wrongdoing in 2020, and he allegedly drafted at least two victims she had never sent. Instead, she continued to cheat for three years.
In a surprisingly candid interview with The New York Times, Siff formally apologized to all clients, acknowledged that the funds were mismanaged and admitted that she had violated her fiduciary obligations – paid the client’s money and distorted the deal for her own interests. “You’re a lie,” she said. “And I don’t have anyone to talk to because everyone around me is either paying to be there or family.”
Dual life is a huge loss. Schiff is under enormous pressure, and while this does not justify her behavior, it provides some context. People feel trapped and tend to make fake choices (whether through situations or their own actions), and Schiff is not immune to human errors or delusions. “That helicopter was very painful for that helicopter. I was very painful for Loewe in Loewe.” She concedes how her high-end escapism obscured the growing sense of panic. “In the end, I thought I would have a stroke.”
The Times interview marks the first time she has publicly resolved her crimes, and the person she chose to speak out before the sentence was not lost. Regardless of her motivation – speaking out or hoping for leniency – may not affect the outcome. As one victim wrote in a statement filed with the court, Schiff’s remorse still rang: “No word shows that she understands the impact of her actions on the stolen people… I heard that Lisa is working with other former clients to apologize to them that her crime lawyer wants to do the right thing to her.
What makes Schiff’s case so disturbing may be that her betrayal is more in-depth than the business. She not only uses the clients, but also their friendship. Many of her victims have long-term personal relationships with her, trusting not only her, but also her confidence. As Artnews reports, the emotional violation has attracted attention in a statement in Candace Carmel Barasch. Baras faced Schiff directly, facing Schiff directly: “Lisa, your shameful behavior goes beyond money. You broke my wife’s heart. She’s been crying for months. You’re her best friend…or she thought. She thought. Barasch added that just a week before Schiff handed in, she asked cowards to ask them for their work for $190,000, which she claimed they were “only” in the collection.
Schiff’s fall is not an isolated incident in the recent history of the art world. Long-term dissatisfied Bouvier incident – involving a network of transactions between Russian billionaire Dmitry Rybolovlev and his art consultant and Freeport Magnate Yves Bouvier, including blockbuster sales Salvator Mundi– It was officially closed in December 2023, although certain procedural matters are still delaying until early 2025. Then there is Inigo Philbrick, an art dealer turned into a cautionary tale, who was arrested on Vanuatu Island in June 2020 and sentenced to seven years in prison. He was released after serving in early 2024.
To sum up, these cases depict disturbing images of high-risk transactions, lack of supervision and a vague art market that can intersect with deception and outright fraud. They highlighted the urgent need for true transparency, clear accountability and functional ethics, especially as the art world continues to become a high-financial playground. As more and more funds flow into the system and more participants, due diligence is no longer a luxury. This is required.
